Manupatra Academy

Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

New

Internships

Opportunities : Playbook : Videos

Learn More

Law Notes (1^st - 5^th Year)

Structured notes with flashcards to help law students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

Manupatra Certified Legal Research Program

Module-based learning : Legal research skills : Certification test

Learn More

Courses

Structured learning : Practice-oriented modules : Different stages of legal practice

Learn More

News and Recent Judgment Gist

News
Gist

1. Supreme Court to hear plea to transfer Vande Mataram PIL from Delhi High Court

Supreme Court to hear plea to transfer Vande Mataram PIL from Delhi High Court

The Supreme Court is likely to hear on October 27 a plea seeking the transfer of a public interest litigation from the Delhi High Court to the apex court. According to the Supreme Court website, a bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana would take up the plea filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay through advocate Ashwani Dubey. The transfer plea submits that the PIL should be moved from the Delhi High Court because a similar writ petition is already pending before the Supreme Court. The underlying PIL seeks to ensure that the song 'Vande Mataram' is honoured and given status equal to the national anthem. The petitioner has also sought a direction to the Centre and the Delhi government to ensure that 'Jana Gana Mana' and 'Vande Mataram' are played and sung in all schools and educational institutions on every working day. The petitioner contends that in the absence of guidelines or regulations to honour the song, 'Vande Mataram' is being sung in an "uncivilised manner" and misused in films and parties. The plea states that 'Vande Mataram' is a symbol of the country's history, sovereignty, unity and pride, and that any citizen who by overt or covert act shows disrespect to it would be engaging in an anti-social activity that would spell doom to the rights and existence of citizens of a sovereign nation. It adds that every citizen must refrain from such activities and do their best to prevent any miscreant from showing disrespect to the song, and that the executive has a duty to frame a national policy to promote and propagate 'Vande Mataram'. The petitioner submits that the song played a historic part in the Indian freedom struggle and ought to be honoured as much as 'Jana Gana Mana', in view of the statement made by Constituent Assembly Chairman Rajendra Prasad in 1950. The petition argues that to keep the country united, it is the government's duty to frame a national policy to promote and propagate 'Jana Gana Mana' and 'Vande Mataram', and that there is no reason for any other sentiment since both were decided by the Constitution makers. It states that the sentiments expressed in 'Jana Gana Mana' have been expressed keeping the State in view, while those in 'Vande Mataram' denote the nation's character and style and deserve similar respect. The petition also asserts that there should be no dramatisation of 'Vande Mataram' and that it must not be included in any variety show, because whenever it is sung or played it is imperative for everyone present to show due respect and honour.

2. US Federal Circuit affirms rejection of compensation claims over 7.68-mile Florida rail corridor

US Federal Circuit affirms rejection of compensation claims over 7.68-mile Florida rail corridor

On October 22, 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling in Barron v. United States that rejected landowners’ compensation claims involving approximately 7.68 miles of the Venice Branch railway corridor in Florida. The dispute arose after Seminole Gulf Railway, the corridor’s operator, filed a notice in March 2019 seeking an exemption to abandon the Venice Branch. The Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners asked the Surface Transportation Board to preserve the corridor for public use and interim trail development, and the STB issued a Notice of Interim Trail Use under the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983, a railbanking mechanism that prevents legal abandonment so the corridor can be kept for potential recreational trail use. The landowners argued that historical conveyance deeds and a 1926 condemnation judgment gave the railroad only limited rights to use the land for railway purposes, and that the proposed trail arrangement interfered with their property interests and amounted to an unconstitutional taking without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The Federal Circuit agreed with the lower court that the railway held fee simple ownership rather than a mere easement. It relied on deed language from several former property owners and companies, including Sarasota Land Company, Clough, Burton, Neihardt, Florida Mortgage and Investment Company, and Ringling, which used broad granting, selling and conveying language, referred in several instances to transfer forever, and in one instance expressly stated fee simple. The court applied Florida Supreme Court guidance that clear and unambiguous deed language must be applied as written and rejected arguments that narrow strips, railway right-of-way terminology, or limited consideration necessarily meant only easements had been conveyed. A separate part of the dispute concerned a condemnation proceeding involving Tampa Southern Railroad Company, which produced a jury award of $61,500 for property taken for railway use and a judgment allowing the property to be appropriated as a railway right-of-way. The supplied text ends before completing what that condemnation judgment did not clearly establish. Because the railway owned the land and the landowners had no reversionary interests taken by the trail arrangement, the Federal Circuit found no grounds for compensation under the Fifth Amendment.

3. IRDAI proposes insurance distribution reforms, seeks comments by 25 October 2026

IRDAI proposes insurance distribution reforms, seeks comments by 25 October 2026

On 23 September 2026, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India issued a public consultation paper titled Recalibrating Economics of Insurance Distribution, proposing wide-ranging reforms to insurance distribution architecture, commissions, expenses, market conduct, transparency and digital infrastructure. IRDAI invited comments and suggestions from stakeholders and the public until 25 October 2026. The proposals aim to expand insurance penetration, improve affordability, reduce distribution costs, promote competition, improve transparency and bring more uninsured citizens into the insurance ecosystem. IRDAI said the reforms are aligned with the objectives of the Sabka Bima Sabki Raksha (Amendment of Insurance Laws) Act, 2025, which seeks to strengthen policyholder protection, improve ease of doing business and facilitate growth of the insurance sector. The consultation paper proposes replacing the current fragmented distribution architecture with three broad categories: Insurance Distribution Entities, Insurance Distribution Persons and Market Infrastructure Institutions. The proposed framework is based on the principle of same structure, same functions, same norms, ensuring entities with similar structures operate under a common regulatory framework. It proposes simpler registration requirements, lower entry barriers, reduced capital requirements and lower regulatory fees for distribution entities. Distributors may be permitted to undertake insurance as well as other financial and non-financial activities, creating additional business and income opportunities. The framework seeks clearer distinctions between open and closed distribution architectures, promotes competition and aims to reduce regulatory arbitrage. For life insurers, the Expense of Management limit is proposed to be linked to Gross Direct Premium Income and reduced to 15% within two years and 12.5% within five years. For general insurers, the EoM framework is proposed to shift from Gross Written Premium to domestic GDPI, with limits reducing from 30% of GWP to 20% of GDPI within five years. IRDAI also proposed lower regulatory fees for insurers and said reduced EoM costs could improve affordability and enhance policyholder returns in life insurance savings products. Instead of a uniform commission structure, commissions may be determined based on product complexity, distribution channel, line of business, business segment and the effort involved in selling and servicing the product. Additional rewards may be permitted for the sale of insurance products in under-served rural and smaller urban markets. The consultation paper also proposes cost audits and safeguards against indirect payments to improve accountability in distribution expenses. Insurers and large distribution entities may be required to publicly disclose commission policies and structures in a simple and accessible manner, and customers would be given greater visibility into distribution costs that form part of insurance pricing. To curb mis-selling, the proposals include documenting customer needs and suitability, including direct and indirect remuneration within the definition of commission, linking policy sales to individual sellers, publicly reporting mis-selling incidents and introducing commission claw-back provisions in cases of mis-selling. The paper also proposes restrictions on volume-linked and reward-linked incentives for bank and NBFC employees selling insurance products. It recognises Market Infrastructure Institutions as digital, pull-based distribution platforms for insurance and mentions Bima Sugam.

4. CAT Patna refuses to quash disciplinary proceedings against IPS officer Aditya Kumar

The Patna Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has refused to quash disciplinary proceedings against Bihar cadre Indian Police Service (IPS) officer Aditya Kumar in Aditya Kumar v. UOI.

CAT Patna refuses to quash disciplinary proceedings against IPS officer Aditya Kumar

The Patna Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has refused to quash disciplinary proceedings against Bihar cadre Indian Police Service (IPS) officer Aditya Kumar in Aditya Kumar v. UOI. Kumar is accused of involvement in a conspiracy to impersonate a former Chief Justice of the Patna High Court in order to influence senior police officials. A Bench of Judicial Member Justice Narendra Kumar Johari and Administrative Member Kumar Rajesh Chandra held that the pendency of criminal proceedings in the matter did not prevent the government from independently examining allegations of misconduct through disciplinary proceedings. The tribunal rejected Kumar's contention that the disciplinary proceedings were malicious because they were initiated shortly after orders extending his suspension were held void for certain procedural lapses, holding that chronology or proximity in time, by itself, does not establish mala fide. The case arose from an FIR registered by Bihar's Economic Offences Unit in October 2022. According to the State government, an individual allegedly impersonated the then Chief Justice of the Patna High Court and contacted the Director General of Police and other senior officials through telephone and WhatsApp calls to secure favourable administrative decisions concerning a senior officer. Kumar was named as an accused and suspended on October 18, 2022. He surrendered before a criminal court in December 2023 and secured bail in April 2024. In March 2025, the CAT declared the extension of his suspension beyond October 17, 2023, invalid because the government had failed to follow the prescribed statutory procedure. Five days after that ruling, the government issued a charge memorandum initiating disciplinary proceedings against him. Kumar challenged the memorandum, arguing that it had been issued after an unexplained delay of more than two years to harass him and to deny him promotion to the rank of Deputy Inspector General of Police. The tribunal found, however, that the government had begun considering disciplinary action in December 2022, well before Kumar obtained any relief against the extension of his suspension. It observed that delay in completing the process may legitimately call for explanation, but that on the material presently available it could not by itself establish that the charge memorandum was conceived as a retaliatory measure after the applicant approached the tribunal. The tribunal further held that the existence of a criminal case did not automatically invalidate departmental proceedings for misconduct, reiterating that a criminal prosecution and a departmental proceeding operate in different fields and are governed by different standards of scrutiny, namely proof beyond all reasonable doubt versus preponderance of probability. It also noted that one departmental charge concerned Kumar's alleged unauthorised absence from his designated headquarters during suspension. While permitting the inquiry to continue, the tribunal expressed concern over the prolonged nature of the proceedings and directed the government to endeavour to conclude them within six months. It clarified that it had expressed no opinion on the merits of the allegations against Kumar. Advocate MP Dixit represented Kumar, while Advocates TN Thakur, Sarvdeo Singh, AK Sharma and Sanjay Kumar appeared for the respondent authorities.

5. Madhya Pradesh High Court holds advocate's client confidentiality duty perpetual after service

Madhya Pradesh High Court holds advocate's client confidentiality duty perpetual after service

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that an advocate's obligation to maintain confidentiality over client communications and professional advice continues after termination of employment and is perpetual. A division bench of Chief Justice Alpesh Y Kogje and Justice Vivek Rusia made the observation while dealing with a petition by a former Legal Head of Sasan Power (respondent no 5), who had been in charge of land acquisition matters concerning the power plant area. The bench said an advocate owes an uncompromising duty of loyalty and confidentiality and is statutorily barred from disclosing communications made in the course and for the purpose of employment by or on behalf of a client, as well as advice given on them, unless there is express consent. It added that this obligation does not cease on termination of employment and remains perpetual, and that the petitioner, as an ex-employee, was not supposed to highlight matters relating to his employer after leaving service. The court described his conduct as highly objectionable and reprehensible. After leaving the company, the petitioner approached the High Court alleging irregularities in the preparation and verification of the list of beneficiaries under the R&R Policy. He said an earlier list had been signed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Singrauli, and alleged that a subsequent list contained irregularities, including ineligible persons and individuals who had been minors in the original list being shown as adults to receive monetary benefits. He also contended that the number of beneficiaries increased by approximately 300 in the subsequent list, allegedly resulting in unlawful monetary benefits to ineligible persons and financial loss to the public exchequer. The petitioner said he had submitted a complaint to the Collector, which was forwarded to the SDO for action, but no effective steps were taken despite several months. He sought directions for production of records relating to the beneficiaries and amounts disbursed under the policy, and an inquiry into the alleged irregularities. The petition was initially placed before a Single Judge, who observed that it ought to be registered as a Public Interest Litigation because the petitioner asserted he had no personal interest. The court noted that he sought a writ of mandamus directing the Collector and Sub-Divisional Officer to submit the entire record, including the list of beneficiaries under the R&R Policy and the amount to be disbursed as per the SDO's order. The court rejected the contention that the petitioner had no personal interest. It further held that he cannot be permitted to bring his cause by way of public interest litigation as he was the legal head in the office.

1. Gir Vanvaso Resort vs. Pancard Clubs Limited (22.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1207/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the dispute between Gir Vanvaso Resort and Pancard Clubs Limited, focusing on the ownership and possession of a resort under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proces

2. Anumandala Rajesh Reddy vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. (24.08.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1206/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals by Anumandala Rajesh Reddy against the State of Karnataka and others, focusing on whether the High Court erred in quashing proceedings initiated by Red

3. Indroneel Goho vs. Razouvonuo Thong and Ors. (29.09.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1203/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeal by Indroneel Goho against Razouvonuo Thong and others, focusing on whether the criminal proceedings for cheating under Sections 417 and 420 of the IPC s

4. Zaki Ullah Khan vs. State of U.P. and Ors. (15.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1202/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether the deed granting fishing rights to Zaki Ullah Khan constituted a lease of immovable property, thus requiring registration and stamp duty. The Collector of

5. Rasilaben and Ors. vs. Dinesh Deumal Harani and Ors. (21.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/1201/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether Rasilaben and others should be impleaded as necessary parties in a suit filed by Dinesh Deumal Harani, who sought a declaration of his status as a tenant o

View More Gist.. View More News..

Law Students Hub

Notes : Flashcards : Landmark Cases & more…

Learn More

New

Legal Glossary

Complex terms decoded : Easy explanations

Learn More

On-demand Courses

Recorded classes : Comprehensive reading material :Quiz

Learn More

Self-Paced Certification

Courses to upskill or reskill

Learn More

Webinars

Recordings of experts views :Diverse topics

Learn More

Law Teachers Hub

Readings : Resources for legal educators

Learn More

Legal Posts

Explainers : Blogs : Articles : Case Analysis

Learn More

Survey Reports

AI Adoption : Technology in law

Learn More

Illustrated Cases

Legal Design : Supreme Court Cases : Multilingual Exploration

Learn More

New

Case Infographics

Quickly understand key facts, court decisions, and legal principles through easy-to-follow infographics.

Know More

Our Partners

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.